Misuse of Social Media at Occupy:
Psy-Ops and Harassment
by Sue Basko
In about mid-December, after the main US Occupy camps had been evicted, an apparent psy-ops campaign appeared nationwide, attacking Occupy participants and volunteers. Psy-Ops are psychological operations designed to make people fearful of participating by making them afraid for their lives or safety, publicly embarrassing them, mocking them, etc.
Across the nation, the pattern of psy-ops against the Occupy groups has been very similar and has taken several forms. One of the most insidious things that has been done is that live streamers, the citizen journalists who provide live video coverage of events, have been harassed and threatened, online as well as in person. Phones have been stolen. Streamers have been physically attacked. Harassing posts have been made on Twitter.
The harassment against the livestreamers is, at least on the surface, being done by people who claim to support violence – either property damage or personal harm. Three of the nation’s major streamers – Oakfosho,TimCast and OccupyFreedomLA have all been harassed by pro-violence people. In many cases, those doing the harassing are identified. TimCast has been physically attacked twice. OccupyFreedomLA had her phone stolen mid-stream. Both TimCast and Oakfosho have been subjected to volleys of vicious harassment by pro-violence forces. OccupyFreedomLA has mainly been harassed by Olaasm, the psy-op working the Occupy LA beat, as well as by a hate-filled man from up in the Oakland area. TimCast has been harassed by repeat online harassers from New York as well as from the Oakland area.
WHO Engages in Psy-Ops? Psy-Ops can be undercover law enforcement agents, such as police officers, FBI, or DHS. The might also be private agencies, such as happened at Occupy Austin, where Stratfor infiltrated. They might also be actual pro-violence people or groups – although I would say, whenever you hear anyone tooting their horn about being pro-violence and haranguing others for not being violent enough or for being a “snitch”, that is your alarm that the person is most likely a law enforcement agent looking to catch those that agree with him or her. Psy-Ops may also be conducted by opposite groups. For example, a right wing group might conduct psy-ops on an Occupy participant or group to discredit them. Psy-Ops are sometimes conducted by lone crazies or small clusters of lone crazies. For example, there are several known such people and clusters in the Los Angeles area—and once you are involved in any politics or activism in the L.A. area, you soon find out that “everyone” knows who they are.
WHAT are the motives in conducting psy-ops? I think the motives of true law enforcement are different from the other groups. All the other groups I listed above have as their motive that they are hate-filled, mentally unstable, and manipulative, and the internet gives them a playground for that.
With law enforcement psy-ops, the goals are mainly twofold: 1) To scare off normal, law-abiding people by causing division, fear, embarrassment; and 2) To attract and gather those who actually do want to plan violence, and set them up for eventual arrest and indictment. Psy-ops can be quite effective at both tasks. However, while it is legal for law enforcement to infiltrate protest groups to ferret out those advocating or planning damage to property or people, it is not legal for law enforcement to harass peaceful people from engaging in their Constitutionally protected rights. Right now that is what is going on – the Constitutional rights of peaceful people are being trampled upon. Please see the DOJ Guidelines regarding FBI Infiltration into groups.
Right now, in the Occupy movement, there is a group of not-quite-bright people caught in the miasma: they are not quite evil enough to be pro-violence, but they also do not have the spine to denounce violence, and they are having trouble seeing that the charismatic people talking trash are most likely actually law enforcement agents. Get clear, folks: You can be in on a criminal conspiracy if you plan or agree to any criminal acts with others.
The playing fields for the online psy-ops maneuvers being used on the Occupy protesters and volunteers are twitter, facebook, blogs, fake profiles on live streams posting troll comments, list serves, etc. The things being done are illegal as crimes or torts – defamation; copyright infringement, such as reposting someone’s private email or other written material; reposting legal emails sent by a lawyer, which is criminal; cyberstalking, cyberbullying, invasion of privacy, endangering safety, and more.
At Occupy LA, a group called Olaasm has made its mark as a harassing psy-ops machine, cranking out prototypical psy-ops material day after day, cyberbullying Occupy LA volunteers in many fields, including social media, website, GA, medics, lawyers (including me), livestreamers, minority participants, and more. Each day a new set of victims is cyberbullied by the Olaasm group. Almost everything that I have read by the Olaasm group and its supporters appears to be illegal as either crime or tort, or both. The Olaasm material is vile, invasive, intrusive, belittling, devoid of all decency. The Olaasm material is written anonymously, but its supporters have made themselves known. Their written material is pure hatred with a right-wing slant, and yet their mock conceit is that they are “more radical than you.” I think it is grossly obvious that the Olaasm group is one of psy-ops – either of law enforcement or paid by a right wing group. Some of the “supporters” of Olaasm are apparently or obviously agents and some are hapless dupes, thinking they are in on something excitingly evil. Maybe the agents and their dupes can all go off together and leave the peaceful protesters alone? Maybe it is time for Occupy LA to condemn this group and its actions?
The Olaasm group and/or supporters seems to be winnowed down to fewer than 10 participants, and yet they have managed to harm the hundreds in the rest of the group. But that is how psy-ops work. Personally, I do not understand what the dupes find alluring in professing a desire to destroy property and harm people, and engaging day to day in hurting the participants and volunteers of their own organization? It takes a person seriously devoid of character development for all that. These are the people who would have stepped right up to help the Nazis load their neighbors onto trains. We’re looking for a few adherents who will be sworn to secrecy, and they must be lacking in any respect for others, with no decency or integrity – come join us in the Olaasm group. Who joins? Who is sufficiently immoral? Who sides with bullies professing violence? Who intentionally systematically harms their own neighbors?
In response to Olaasm, a group of guardian angels and protectors has formed on Twitter, with the handle @AgBlink. @AgBlink has few listed “followers,” but MANY actual followers. The @Agblink folks have given me permission to use their list of Psy-Ops techniques, which they provide to let Occupiers know about the techniques being used against them by groups such as Olaasm.
A Psy-Ops campaign embedded in the Occupy movement:
1) creates a negative public image for targets (e.g. by surveilling activists, & then releases personal information).
2) attacks internal organization (e.g. agents create false tensions, or blog & tweet to try to create conflicts).
3) creates dissension between groups (e.g. spreads false rumors or vilifies volunteers).
4) restricts access to public resources (e.g. pressures non-profit organizations to cut off funds or material support).
5) restricts the ability to organize protests (e.g. agents promote violence against police at protests).
6) restricts the ability of individuals to participate in group activities (e.g by character assassinations, intimidation).


19 Comments
OLAASM Critiques
Submitted by jmonroe310 on
Hey Sue. I agree that those affiliated with OLAASM shouldn't be making these personal attacks on people. However, the best way to stop it may be the classic response to internet trolls; ignore them and they'll go away. If the objectives of OLAASM is to wage a psyop campaign against those they feel "aren't radical enough", whatever that means, focusing on them negatively, thereby creating the appearance/reality of divide, and allowing them to mess with your emotional state, plays into their strategy.
Dangerous
Submitted by Sue Basko on
Dear J Monroe, It has come to my attention that the "head" of the Olassm group states in his own blog that he is a convicted felon who did 3 years in prison for armed robbery. It sounds as if he did those robberies as a white man and very privileged. This is not a simple situation, but rather, a very dangerous situation for all involved. It is nothing to be scoffed at or ignored.
Sue Basko, Lawyer
OCCUPY PEACE - Legal Info on How to Hold a Peaceful Protest or Occupation
Huh
Submitted by jmonroe310 on
Didn't know about that. Hopefully it gets resolved between all parties involved without violence, maybe start an internal issues group/peaceful debate ga segment, with meetups with someone from olaasm to discuss both what they do and their percieved issues with ola media. Good luck and power to all those fighting corruption.
Good points
Submitted by occupation blog on
Yes, "someone" that can explain "what they do" and their "perceived issues" would be useful. And if they have their own designation, OLA-ASM, what do they care that OLA thinks vandalism, property damage and violence are antithetical, and counterproductive, to the movement? I thought that was why the started the phony "OLA" group in the first place.
If you figure it out, let me know.
OLAASM Critiques
Submitted by jmonroe310 on
Edit: Accidental double post...
lol
Submitted by ctizzie on
Sue Basko, internet expert on everything
Wait. Who is crazy?
Submitted by JimBobForskin on
First off, I am non-violent and have no idea who olaasm is. I feel compelled to write this cause this blog entry finally got me to the breaking point.
It is ironic that direct "democracy" is thrown out by Occupy Media Committee so freely when you don't really know what it is. Democracy is not when everyone agrees and cheerleaders, rather real democracy includes disagreement. It is diverse. Even in social movements. Forces in Occupy LA, most centrally those on the undemocratic Media Committee want to squash internal dissent and by extension democracy by making paranoid claims of cointelro infiltration and Psy-ops. These wild claims have no basis in reality thus they are either engaging in dishonest claims to create a climate of fear so OLA rank and file will rally around them thus maintaining their secure positions that give them a sense of power or they are delusional and insular and believe that their is a conspiracy because they think they are a real threat to those in power.
Reality is probably closer to an internal desire to preserve their positions of power. In Occupy Movements, especially LA, controlling media IS power. GAs have far less attendees than Facebook readers. Heck, more read Facebook than show up for actions. That is what makes the movement so impotent, a simulation of real activism. Chatting it up on social networks IS the movement. Thus the media committee wants to preserve their positions of power. Some have religious views ("spirituality" but it IS religion) and they use Occupy LA as a forum to evangelize their beliefs under the guise of Occupy related issues. I can assure you, Occupy LA will continue to flounder if it is not secular.
Many on the commitee have or want to have careers in the media. Some live streamers are self styled personalities. Thus, the motivation is way beyond ego or power, rather it is monetary. Of course they want 1%ers like Russell Simmons or Deepak Chopra to speak, it is a career opportunity. The chance to speak on media outlets, it is all career advancement for media professionals. Part of the reason why pros should not be on the committee in the first place. That is why they created a governance structure that is anti democratic. That is why they selectively apply the code of conduct. Supporters never get banned.
But ego and power tripping come into play as well. This is their chance to be in the public eye. LA has loads of entertainment and media folks, most do not reach celebrity status. So OLA is an opportunity to finally make it.
Notice get to accuse or ban folks without an impartial judge. They are like the Bushies that believe in military tribunals versus the rule of law. Thus OLA IS the law, Judge and Jury and Prosecution. How did rank and file OLAers let this happen? Cause of odious posts like this.
If OLA was a direct democracy than the Media Committee would transparent and open. Members would rotate off the committee to ensure that hierarchy and abuse of power does not develop. That takes vigilance. NYC had big problems with this and made efforts to deal with it.
If OLA's criticisms of the mainstream corporate media are to have weight, than you have to actually be better. If direct democracy is a genuine value, practice it. Hell, even our crappy representative democracy has term limits. Instead of having a plutocratic grip, live up to the values you espouse. If this is OUR movement like you say, than don't horde power. Willingly reform the corrupted media committee.
If they respond to this, it will be dismissive or slander. They won't answer the questions. Instead they will claim Psy-op or cointelro. It is comedy but also a way of insulating themselves FROM democracy. If leaders in OLA can't handle criticism and respond by dismissing or excluding critics, the movement becomes theirs. It is already and IS shrinking. So their movement is a smaller and less inclusive and effective movement. "Unity" is code for follow the leader, don' be critical.
Activism is new for most in OLA (or they are the gang of longtime failed activists who also see OLA as a chance to finally get their due). So they don't see the power dynamics. It is hard to imagine that something so idealistic could have such cynical people at the core. In that sense, OLA is like American democracy. Those that choose not see it are like average American voters. Unchecked power, be it state power or OLA will lead to abuse and corruption. When power feels threatened, it acts to protect itself. Thus the wild eyed and paranoid claims. See them for what they are.
If OLA is to survive, it must challenge the media committed undemocratic power grab. It must fully democratize the committee. Then OLA can focus on actions versus being captive to careerist media and culture industry professionals.
ALL power to the people.
appreciation Thank You
Submitted by 3rock on
1st: MOST appreciative Sue Basko is educating about the; 1% war wage against us. VERY Appreciated.
2nd: Am 61; Just want to give APPRECIATION to JimBobForskin & everyone who posts OCCUPY where ever, especially here (see below). The more people that just post a reply to a good post about why obvious thought is not being utilized, the more in tune all occupies will become, especially here. Cool: All power to the people
3rd: I don't know how many people read this site or post, but it's super nice that liz is always reading & replying.
On a personal note
Submitted by lizsavage on
On a personal note
Sue can you please chill out, you are not helping the situation. I am mentally exuasted dealing with this. I have PTSD from being on the front lines of Oakland, and also have to deal with every board becoming a battle ground.
Please just go back to writing about movements, no personal attacks, I don't allow it from either side.
You see what happens? I go do other things for a few days and all hell breaks loose. And Ctizze, how did you get back here? I don't mind you staying, and I like your writing, but I don't like when you go on attack. Write about the movement, direct your anger at the ones who opress, not the ones who are standing at our sides in this fight.
My words represent myself and not Occupy Los Angeles. @lizsavage on Twitter
Back?
Submitted by ctizzie on
Point of information: I have never been "banned" from this site, and was banned from Facebook because I had the audacity to challenge 2 admins who were acting inappropriately toward a fellow occupier.
Dear Citzzee
Submitted by PMbeers on
Citzzee That is not true. You were banned for repeated chronic abusive comments. The situation with a fellow occupier was a philosophical disagreement which is something the SM team encourages. We have never removed a comment or banned anyone for disagreeing. We banned you because we have have taken a lot of crap form you and had tolerated your abuse for far too long.
And as far as democracty goes, banning you was 100% agreed upon.
"They purposefully keep people misinformed and fearful through t
Submitted by JimBobForskin on
"They purposefully keep people misinformed and fearful through their control of the media"
This is all this post is.
OLA Media Taking Cues from Syrian Government
Submitted by JimBobForskin on
"Assad has blamed the unrest on foreign provocateurs implementing a “conspiracy." http://bit.ly/z6zLiz
Dear JimBobForskin,
Submitted by PMbeers on
Why don't you use your real name?
Do you personally know any of the live streamers well enough to know what their intent is? You say they want fame but how do you base this assumption?
Have you ever been to a media committee meeting? You are making assumptions that everyone agrees and no one disagrees? What facts do you have to back up this claim?
Why do you think the media team has a position of power?
Who on the media team is evangelizing? Do you know if this person is or is not on the media team? How would you know that?
Which Los Angeles live streamer wants a career in the media? Have you ever had a personal conversation with any of them?
Why should it matter if someone on the media team wants a professional career in the media field? shouldn't it matter more that they support OLA?
Are you aware that the three most active current live streamers are not on the media team and act as independent journalists?
How is the media team undemocratic? What do you know about how the media team makes decisions?
Are you aware that Facebook and Twitter are not run by the media team? This is another bit of misinformation that I keep hearing people repeat despite the number of times this has been clarified.
Do you have any FACTS to support any ofl your assumptions?
You would like members to rotate on and off the media committee. Please show me the line of people waiting to get on the committee when the current members hypothetically step down.
You talk a lot about things you know nothing about.
If you really have constructive criticism for the media team why are you posting it here and not going to the committee meeting and address it there? Is your intention to help or to destroy?
I hear a lot of misinformed vague criticism but I don't hear you asking questions and trying to get information. Instead I see you repeating the same misinformation that I keep hearing form others.
From my perspective it seems that you and others who are criticizing the media team are doing so in a destructive and not a constructive manner.
You mentioned an OLA leader above. There are no leaders. Please stop spreading misinformation.
You stated that OLA has cynical people. You seem to be one of them. Your criticism are a mirror to who you really are.
Seriously, this site is not
Submitted by lizsavage on
Seriously, this site is not run or maintained by the "media committee" In fact they do very little when it comes to this site, this site is maintained by and posted to by volunteers, who all work autonomously.I end up making GA announcements, as no one wants to do it.
What the media team actually does... well try going to a meeting, its usually argue. Some people and some working groups work very well and GSD but the overall 'committee" has certain people who have been there from the beginning just to derail meetings.
Thats why I don't go, and hadn't until the structure group thing came up. I got everyone together to work in what we needed to get done, but when it came down to it, again no one too responsibility.
I did not ban ctizzie, just to clarify, honestly I have stood up for his right to speak on more than one occasion as he often says things I cannot, but agree with. What I do not agree with is the personal attacks, from any side. He was banned by other mods, who are still mods, some come some go, but some have been around since the very beginning.
Its even more difficult being the one in the middle as I tend to know the people posting here in person. A few I do not, but as a whole, I would say I do know more than 50% of the contributors. I wish we had more, but with people who are obviously being paid to destroy this movement, telling everyone not to use the site, it makes it rather difficult to keep followers.
This is the last article I want to see, if there are any more, I do not want them put on the font page, PERIOD. I am not the only one who feels this way.
This site is a place for discussion, not fighting, you have that horrific list serve and apparently FB for that, keep it there.
Peace
My words represent myself and not Occupy Los Angeles. @lizsavage on Twitter
Thanks Liz
Submitted by frankc on
Thanks for the insights. I have been reading the book, Horizontalism and the stories of these and other struggles are all part of the "walk".From what I have read I would say this just proves we are on track .Some people like myself like action rather then meetings, others like meetings more then action. Eventually we will all need to do both to fully contribute.The negative imputs are probably from people who have not participated in meeting and /or actions and have missed out on possibilities of personal growth and contributions to the movement.
Infiltrators, brainwashing and egos, oh my!
Submitted by Mahayana on
Sue: This is good information. There are many motives that would make certain organizations or people who are threatened financially by the movement want to squash the movement completely. It is not farfetched to believe there are paid infiltrators to harm the movement. DHS was there when the camp was broken up & helped to coach the LAPD on how to handle this. When DHS gets involved, you know the gov't is taking this seriously. Our Government has admitted to funding and creating opposition groups to overthrow foreign governments - not hard to believe they would have interest in seeing us disappear. What better way to do it than from the inside ? The more they try to forcefully dismantle it through law enforcement - the bigger the backlash and the stronger the movement becomes.
I don't believe as many people as you think are a part of the Psy-Ops squad Sue. You underestimate the pervasiveness of assholes and idiots. As Jmonroe said, the best way to deal with those types is to ignore them. Like trolls, they will go away when they can no longer incite a reaction. There are those people who resort to more extreme forms of protest. It does not necesarrily mean they are Psy-Ops. An angry & sometimes violent public is a symptom of a corrupt and oppressive government. To be honest, I'm surprised there isn't more of it. You can tell just how asleep the American people are because of the LACK of anger towards their goverment. I'm not saying I condone violence, I'm just saying it's a natural reaction. I believe at this point in time, more can be acheived through non-violent protest.
Even though you are probably right about some of what you said in your blog, you should really back off on the frequent posts on this subject. One post is fine. Just update it whenever you feel you have new info that you think is pertinent for us to see. We really don't want that in our face every time we log on to this site. Some of that is the fault of the web team. I personally don't think just ANYBODY should have their blog splashed across the main homepage of OLA. I mean, I could get a blog on here and spout out some pretty off the wall crazy shit and that would be the first thing a new person that comes to OLA would see - AND they would mistake that content as being put out directly by OLA (As Billy BobForeskin incorrectly assumed)
To those that believe what Sue says here:
It's good to be aware of something like this but it is also harmful if you allow the paranoia & fear to take over. It's like that Twighlight Zone episode where aliens land in a small town. Everyone (for some reason & I can't remember why) supects the other of being an alien and in the end they all end up killing each other. Meanwhile, the two aliens that landed are sitting on a hilltop nearby watching the whole event play out. They didn't need to do anything because the fear and paranoia is what destroyed the townspeople. Hell yes, I found a link! Watch it if you have never seen it before. It's Rod Sterling at his finest: http://www.myspace.com/video/vid/7051963
(And yes Sue, I know as a copyright lawyer, you are appalled by my posting this link)
What I have heard over & over again on this site is, "be careful of what we say", "Don't associate with them or we might give off the wrong image" or other things implying if we just have a discussion or loosely associate with a group, that we will certainly be brainwashed. Don't even talk about the Federal Reserve because if you do, you are suddenly a Anti-semetic conspiracy theorist. Others stay away from OLA because they fear they will be indoctrinated with communist rhetoric and repeating what someone else says at the GA is CLEARLY a form of brainwash.
What the fuck happened to people thinking for themselves? We should not fear infiltrators or the thought of getting "misled" if we were to just use our own brains & think for ourselves. Anyone remember Patrick Howley from back in October? He was a journalist that opposed OWS & infiltrated a rally in Washington D.C. Some people had gathered in front of the Smithsonian Air & Space museum with plans of placing a banner in front of a drone being exhibited. It is said that howley was resonsible for causing the protesters to charge inside the building which led to them getting a face full of pepper spray. If you are using your brain, you would've stopped and said, "who is this rambunctious asshole trying to convince us to charge inside this Musuem full of patrons? Fuck no I'm not going to charge in there because that would probably scare the public and piss off the security gaurds." No good could come from that yet Howley incited them and they did it anyway. FFS, lets just use our heads and not do something because everyone else around us thinks it's ok. Don't believe every single thing the Occupy movement tells you. That's no different from accepting everything the mainstream media tells you. Just think for yourself & come to your own conclusions - not anyone elses & you'll be okay.
JimBobForskin: Yes. This is LA. You are bound to meet a lot of egos here. Those who are not in it for the right reasons will go as media attention dissipates. Our streamers IMO are pretty fucking amazing. As much as I can tell, Freedom (our main streamer) does love the opportunity to get in front of a news camera and be in the limelight, but her genuinity is apparent in her streams. (at least to me) With the meager donations our streamers get, I highly doubt they are in it for the money.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves - in their separate, and individual capacities. -Abe
Much of the above (SighCops)
Submitted by JohnnyHaze on
I know a lot of people on all sides of this issue (it must be 6 sides, since it sometimes feels like being boxed in, with no escape that doesn't result in arguments). I like most of these people, to some degree. Ironically, I have to fight my instinct to despise the population of our nation as an amorphous whole.
I wouldn't be surprised if some people think I'm a provocateur or CIAgent or Iranian spy or staff writer for Bill Maher or producer for Fawkes News (or Fox News). I'm none of those. If you bothered to follow me around (like an undercover cop!), you'd know that; here's hoping you have better things to do.
In the grand scheme of these things, I tend to agree with the radical contingent, and I'm tired of the bullshit that equates such sympathies with violence against living beings (self-defense is another matter). As for property, we ALL "own" the property of the state, so...
I also use the word and letter "I" to start almost all of my sentences in this post.
P.S.
Submitted by JohnnyHaze on
Mahayana: I was in D.C. when that Patrick Howley incident occurred. One of the other people that appeared to be following Howley's charge on the Museum guards (as seen in a photo from the skirmish) had been at our G.A. in Freedom Plaza earlier that week, and was obviously a pissed-off guy who was itching for some "action". I tried to talk to him after he stormed away from the GA, but couldn't figure out what his agenda was, other than being angry and frustrated.
Pages