Nonviolence Misundersood?

KosmiK Guru's picture

Forums: 

Hello Objectives/Research Team, 

 I feel that "nonviolence" is very loosely used by the group to refer to "no violence" as opposed to being a "nonviolent movement".  I think there needs to be a committee that specifically discusses how nonviolence principles can shape the movement - Gene Sharp's book has been a good guide for our Egyptian friends - i am sure there was a focussed effort to read, understand and strategize based on it.

 
Nonviolence is as much about strategy as it is about being peaceful and  not being violent.  I think a focussed effort is needed in doing a deep evaluation of how nonviolence principles can determine the course of action.
 
On a side note:
 
I also think we need to start with the end in mind - what does accomplishment look like?  And then determine how we can apply nonviolent techniques to move towards that.  This will give us tangible exit criteria, and a yardstick for those involved in the movement to know where we are, what is working and not working, and how we can adjust course to get to the end goal.  I know this is easier said than done, but again, there needs to be a focussed effort towards this - to make sure that the occupation is not a wasted effort.
 
Thanks,
~Kos

Non-violence

I've been searching for information on this movement's commitment or non-commitment to non-violence. Seems there's not been too much talk about this. My BIG worry is that if the movement fails to commit to non-violence we leave ourselves open to sabotage. Remember, know your enemy. You already KNOW these people have no shame. How long before they frame us and we lose this beautiful moment.? We need to keep our eyes on the prize. I haven't been able to make it down to the GA but spent the better part of last weekend downtown. Except for this one question, it's all good...

Wildthing

Pages