Why The Zeitgeist Movement should absorb The Occupy Movement and Move towards a True Economy.

Forums: 

The Zeitgeist Movement's principle focus includes the recognition that the majority of the social problems which plague the Human species at this time are not the sole result of some institutional corruption, scarcity, a political policy, a flaw of “Human Nature” or other commonly held assumptions of causality in the activist community. Rather, The Movement recognizes that issues such as poverty, corruption, collapse, homelessness, war, starvation and the like appear to be “Symptoms” born out of an outdated social structure.

While intermediate reform steps and temporal community support are of interest to The Movement, the defining goal here is the installation of a new socioeconomic model based upon technically responsible resource management, allocation, distribution through what would be considered the scientific method of reasoning problems and finding optimized solutions.

This “Resource-Based Economic Model” is about taking a direct technical approach to social management as opposed to a monetary or even a political one. It is about updating the workings of society to the most advanced and proven methods Science has to offer, leaving behind the damaging consequences and limiting inhibitions which are generated by our current system of monetary exchange, profits, corporations, and other structural and motivational components.

In 2008, an independent film called, “Zeitgeist Addendum” hit the Internet and went viral just as “Zeitgeist” had in the previous year. Though both films are directed by the same person, only the second film, “Addendum” actually has anything to do with the global sustainability advocacy group known as The Zeitgeist Movement. Most recently, “Zeitgeist: Moving Forward”, has hit 12,000,000 views on a single YouTube channel and The Movement, abbreviated as TZM, has been growing and hosting Town Hall meetings around the world.

The Zeitgeist Movement's Townhall Meetings are live, public events conducted by official regional chapters worldwide. These are community forums for the public to engage TZM advocates & coordinators about the understanding to the social solutions proposed and a global, RESOURCE-BASED ECONOMIC MODEL (RBE). These monthly events serve to provide a grass-roots, personal engagement to continue the momentum and interest in the resolving ongoing social problems.

ZMCA.ORG
TZMLACA.ORG
THEZEITGEISTMOVEMENT.COM
ZEITGIESTMOVIE.COM

LOL at crypto!

DUDE (well red), you're pasting the same text under different thread headings? looks like spam!


 


although i agree with TZM completely, please, you're being a little pompous now. the other thread is...absorb OLA? what's next...'if you are not with us, you are against us?' LOL


amidoingitright...?


Mahayana's picture

Sorry, but I don't think

Sorry, but I don't think anybody here wants to be "digested". Perhaps you meant to say "Why the Occupy Movement should absorb Zeitgeist knowledge"?

"have you even looked into the value system and the socioeconomic structure we advocate?"

Yes, I think most people here are familiar with the Zeitgeist ideology. The similarities between the two movements are that we both agree that there is a worldwide mis-allocation of resources and that we have a flawed economic system. The occupy movement isn't about ideologies though. This is a movement that takes real issues that we are facing now and through dialogue coming up with strategies on how to fix our broken system. Yeah, we get that there's enough food to feed the planet although people are starving in third world countries. We have the inequality of the 99% VS the 1% here in our country. We are addressing that. That's why we are here. I don't know what wisdom you think the Zeitgeist movement has that Occupy doesn't. Peter Joseph spouts some pretty vague, and what are to me obvious ideas & beliefs, and scores it to some new age music. Suddenly people feel that they are oh so enlightened. I agree some of what the film speaks about but the idea of this world-wide effort to ration out resources through this autonomous cyber-society just really creeps me out. Like crypto said, it is kinda cultish. I probably would have a more positive outlook on it if I hadn't heard an interview with Peter Joseph where he came across as a total asshole.

The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves - in their separate, and individual capacities. -Abe

Mahayana's picture

If you have a specific

If you have a specific zeitgeist ideology that is pertinent to this movement, feel free to share but please do not spam. It will just turn people off to you & your movement. Just remember, unlike the Zeitgeist movement/ideology, this movement is very action oriented so it is best to share ideas on things that can be implented into action.

The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves - in their separate, and individual capacities. -Abe

Mahayana's picture

"the technology is available

"the technology is available to raise the standard of living of every living organism on this planet yet we, myself included, are still very conditioned by our culture it seems to cling to an "identity" which has been essentially built by the system we seek to change collectively"

The Zeitgeist movement takes issue with people having an identity? Wow, I'm really not trying to be mean, but I don't think you could come off as sounding any more cult-like. So once we let go of our identities, you want us to succumb to the church of Zeitgeist and join the collective consciousness that will magically, through just awareness of the idea, usher in an age of technological utopia where machines serve us and the .001% steps down and gladly hands over access to resources so we can live happily ever after? 

Sorry, but I would like to think my identity is independent of the society in which I live.  It is the fact that we cling to our identities which allow us to come together and stand up to an oppressive system which is hell bent on trying to take away our individual rights.

I am all for improving our lives by using technology to find ways to minimize our impact on the environment (solar power, alternatives to gas etc...) but I have no desire to live in a world where we become dependent on technology to manage our daily lives, down to how we access food. I think as it is, we are overly dependent on computers and automated systems.

Widespread governance gives way to widespread corruption. Our system is not flawed, (imo) it is the people who run it who are flawed. Our founding fathers designed the constitution so that the government was a non-intrusive entity whose powers were limited to facilitating the needs of those states which make up the Republic. The government was originally to be by the people for the people. It of course has mutated into something very different, but that is exactly why Occupy came into existence - to attempt to take the power back from the hands of the greedy few. The zeitgeist ideology is actually not too far off from what the founding fathers had in mind. Government and politics are essentially dealing with the allocation of resources (just on a smaller scale). I don't think the majority of them would have ever wanted this huge gap between the haves & the have nots.

All views are welcome here but you should really discuss issues independent of any ideology. Throwing out a few vague ideas and saying "come to our meetings" to learn more is just a little too religiousy for my taste. People would take you more seriously if you didn't end your messages with an invite to join your organization. If you have such revolutionary ideas, you should be able to chime in on existing threads & discussions. Otherwise it's just spam.

 

The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves - in their separate, and individual capacities. -Abe

cryptomnesiac's picture

Are you joking?

You think I didn't understand your use of the word? I understand it all too well! And I'm disgusted by the cheek of it. You have a lot of nerve marching in with your new age cult, and thinking you have a captive audience of naïfs eagerly awaiting indoctrination.

If you want to discuss your views with someone, feel free, but don't presume to come from nowhere, and dictate how things ought to be. 

Pages