Forums:
WHO ACTUALLY OWNS THE FEDERAL RESERVE AND WHY THAT MUST END
Global Revolution 1: American Revolution 2: Day 25: Communication 1
11 Oct 2011 (g1a2d0025c1)
Few questions of late have been asked more frequently or answered with less transparency than this one:
WHO OWNS THE FED?
The domain name for the official website is FederalReserve.gov, the ".gov" extension of which suggests that the Federal Reserve System (a.k.a. the "Fed") is part of the United States government and therefore owned by the American taxpayers. But that is not the case. As the Fed itself states...
"The Federal Reserve System fulfills its public mission as an independent entity within government. It is not 'owned' by anyone and is not a private, profit-making institution. As the nation's central bank, the Federal Reserve derives its authority from the Congress of the United States. It is considered an independent central bank because its monetary policy decisions do not have to be approved by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branches of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by the Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms."
http://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/about_14986.htm
Parts of that statement are true, sort of, and parts of that statement are not. Factcheck.org provides a better answer:
"There are actually 12 different Federal Reserve Banks around the country, and they are owned by big private banks. But the banks don't necessarily run the show. Nationally, the Federal Reserve System is led by a Board of Governors whose seven members are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate... The concept of 'ownership' needs some explaining here, however. The member banks must by law invest 3 percent of their capital as stock in the Reserve Banks, and they cannot sell or trade their stock or even use that stock as collateral to borrow money. They do receive dividends of 6 percent per year from the Reserve Banks and get to elect each Reserve Bank's board of directors. The private banks also have a voice in regulating the nation's money supply and setting targets for short-term interest rates, but it's a minority voice. Those decisions are made by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which has a dozen voting members, only five of whom come from the banks. The remaining seven, a voting majority, are the Fed's Board of Governors who, as mentioned, are appointed by the president."
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/03/federal-reserve-bank-ownership/
That's a better answer, but not a totally complete or correct one. Yes, there are 12 Federal Reserve Banks, all of which are owned by private banks, and all of which must pay dividends to their owners. So contrary to what it claims, the Fed is not only privately-owned but a for-profit enterprise. And yes, there *should* be 7 members of the FOMC appointed by the government and 5 appointed by the banks. In fact, however, for unstated reasons and for some time now there have been only 5 people seated on the FRB Board of Governors, none of whom are celebrated consumer advocates...
http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/default.htm
...which means government appointees do NOT outnumber bank appointees on the FOMC, and you can rest assured that the private banks DO "run the show":
http://tinyurl.com/6346ltz
So the question then becomes:
WHICH PRIVATE BANKS CONTROL THE FED?
The Web is awash with lists and percentages on this one supported by nothing more than links that refer to other links that refer back to the original and often anonymous post. A notable exception is the work of Jake Towne, who in March of 2009 applied an admittedly imperfect but plausible engineering approach to the problem and, after some extensive research and number-crunching, concluded the following:
"[The] top 4 banks - Bank of America (BAC), JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, and Wachovia - would control roughly 50% of the stock of the Federal Reserve Bank, and the top 10 banks, including Wells Fargo (WFC), HSBC (HBC), and the Bank of New York (BK), would control over 68% of the stock."
http://seekingalpha.com/article/123381-who-owns-the-fed
So according to Jake, whoever ultimately controls these ten banks thereby also controls the Federal Reserve:
Bank of America Corp.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
CitiGroup
Wachovia Bank (subsequently acquired by Wells Fargo)
Wells Fargo N.A.
US Bank
State Street Corp.
HSBC Bank
Suntrust Bank
Bank of NY Mellon
TO RECAP... The Federal Reserve System that has used its debt-based currency to exploit our economy since 1913 is a private banking cartel consisting of 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks. Each of those banks are required to pay dividends to their shareholders, which makes them for-profit enterprises. Those shareholders are all private banks and obviously also for-profit enterprises that exist not to maintain the welfare of humankind - or even the American subset thereof - but rather to maximize the wealth of their shareholders.
AND WHO ARE THEIR SHAREHOLDERS?
Keep tracing your way up the ownership pyramid, and you may find some have (in)famous names like Rothschild, Rockefeller or Buffett. Others in this global elite we collectively refer to as "the 1%". Either way, their interests align with those of the rest of us - "the 99%" - only in the same manner as those of shepherds and the sheep that they shear in good times and slaughter in bad.
This must end. And that is why the Fed must end.
Related Image:
http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/9514/fedmembersgraph.jpg
Related Video:
http://tinyurl.com/kleptocracytutorial
###
I AM NOT ANONYMOUS. I AM AN AMERICAN.
I am not just a Consumer. I am a Citizen.
I will no longer be labeled Left or Right, Liberal or Conservative, Demopublican or Republocrat.
I will no longer follow Puppets labeled Left or Right, Liberal or Conservative, Demopublican or Republocrat.
I am the People. And I am coming for the Puppetmasters.
I am part of the 99 Percent. And I demand the following:
1. End the Fed.
2. Reverse Citizens United.
3. Repeal PATRIOT Act.
4. Expose 9/11 Truth.
5. End Profit Wars.
6. Refund Taxpayer Trillions.
7. Imprison the Kleptocrats.
8. Single Term Limits.
###
LABELS (A POEM OF PROTEST)
"Democrat", "Republican",
The parties of the system;
Puppets both, for sale their votes,
No character or wisdom.
"Liberal", "Conservative",
For change or status quo?
Pick either one, the change is none,
All charlatans and whores.
Far "Left" we place the Anarchists,
Libertarians claim far "Right";
Yet both decry the government:
False continuum brought to light.
For oil, "We" bomb their mud huts,
Strip them bare, then offer "Aid";
And fake their retribution as
Pretext - a false flag raised.
Unarmed hundred thousands killed
By weapons of "Defense",
While rights are lost for "Freedom" sake -
On profit, all depends.
With stroke of pen, the "Patriot" Act,
And patriots' gifts are taken;
Then "Citizens United" leaves
Our citizens forsaken.
We protest loss of liberties,
Put "World Wide Web" to use;
Cloudmark Authority censors us
For "messaging abuse".
They label us to finger-point,
With labels, "They" deride us;
Their labels keep us all at bay,
For with labels, "They" divide us.
IronBoltBruce
###
JOIN THE GLOBAL REVOLUTION!
Occupy Wall Street:
http://www.livestream.com/globalrevolution
http://occupywallst.org/
Occupy DC:
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/october2011
http://october2011.org/
Occupy LA:
http://www.livestream.com/owslosangeles
http://occupylosangeles.org/
Occupy Together:
http://occupytogether.org/
Watch these Videos:
http://tinyurl.com/kleptocracytutorial
Take this Pledge:
http://wp.me/p19dS3-9o
###
PUBLIC NOTICE: No talking heads on Comcast/GE's NBC/CNBC/MSNBC speak for us. No talking heads on Murdoch's Faux News speak for us. No talking heads at the Kleptocracy's Compliant News Network (CNN) speak for us (no matter how dull, deliberate or subtle their delivery). No talking heads in the lamestream media speak for us, period. And neither do ANY of the 537 bought-and-paid-for Kleptocracy puppets in Washington DC who will soon be joining our legions of unemployed!

Comment on Comment
Submitted by occupation blog on
Thanks Bruce for bringing valuable information to our discussion. Your assessment of both the banking industry and the purpose of the movement are shared by many of us here.
Occupation Blog
oh my god ! i love u ! Thank u for this post!
Submitted by LastChance on
GREAT JOB !!! Perfecct assesment and well written
...
Submitted by LovingFighter on
I like your energy, but I disagree that all those things will make things the way they should be. Ending the Fed (and all those things in your list) will not end injustice nor periodic crisis.
An explanation of dialectical relationships
Submitted by estebanmgil on
I want to write about and add a critique about this whole END THE FED discussion. I'm not saying that this isn't an important issue, but I want to caution those who hold this close to their hearts from not being overly deterministic when they bring this topic up in conversation. I'm beginning to notice a few of you who are dissatisfied that this topic is not constantly and soley up for discussion at all times.
We have to recognize the difference between causal inference and dialectical relationships. Arguing that the discussion of the FED should be of primary importance is healthy, but calling for its destruction to be our one and only goal is egoistic, and overly deterministic.
What I mean is that this discussion implies that the federal reserve is the root of the problem. It may be, I'm not well versed in monetary policy. But it is not the only conversation worth having. This would be as short-sighted as saying Al Gore invented the internet, there-for, we have Al Gore to thank for the creation of social networking and the rise of horizontal participatory democracy movements like this--And ManBearPig.
Our technology discloses our relatiionship with nature. A technological innovation with regards to the federal reserve question is the money commodity (a need to resolve the difference between the use-value and exchange-value of commodities we produce). This relationship is effected and effects, dialectically, our proecesses of production (labor), which in turn, dialectically relates to the reproduction of daily life (commodities we use and need every day) and which is further developed in a dialogue between our dialy life and our social relations.
This continuous process is itself a disclosure of the interaction of our social relations and the way we labor and produce.
Our social relations dialectically effect and are effected by our mental conceptions, which in turn effect and are effected by our technology.
These dialectical (not causal) relationships further show us the interconnected interactions between our mental concepts, our processes of porduction, our social relations (and the relationship between our processes of production and social relations) and how they all relate back to our technological development.
Is the Fed part of the problem? Probably. Is it the only issue we need to address? Not even close. Please think of the big picture before freaking out about not moving quick enough to reformulate monetary policy in the USA. I encourage the discussion and ask that those of you interested go to the Occuptation and go around on your own volition to form a study group on the subject. This way, you can form proposals for joint action which will be tempered by the heat of a wide variety of opinions before being put into the crucible of the General Assembly.
Still sking if the Fed is the
Submitted by donnaruiz6558 on
Still sking if the Fed is the root of the problem is wondering why my hens were slaughtered last night where I left the wolf taking care of them. The Fed is just a tool, an instrument created for those who really owns this country, sad but true. Totally agree that fed needs to be terminated, it's not even a bank, it's not under any goverment and still controls the world's largest economy.
it is totally insane!
Donna
Pages