United We Stand Divided We Fall, an old slogan of Solidarity

Yvonne de la Vega's picture

 


 

When first hearing of Occupy Los Angeles, it occurred to me that the decades long Revolution that began in the 1960’s with Dr. King, Bob Dylan, The Last Poets, the '60's and The Summer of Love, with Jim Morrison who shouted “WAKE UP!!!”, including the many students of Jackson and Kent State, Berkley. Later, Rage Against The Machine and countless others since then until nowis this same Revolution, it hit me that, this is it. The Revolution has come to a head, Revolution is no longer a performance poet’s buzzword... but it’s become the reality we've all been waiting for, for a very long time.

With a new pride and sudden wonderment I asked myself, why now? At the hands of this generation of humankind, why us? I realized that we are all part of the evolution of The Movement with all of  it’s universal components, including it’s martyrs such as Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Abraham, JFK, Tupac, also it’s weapons, namely the Internet with it’s artillery social media, and I should not here exclude the sub-formations of decentralized organizations such as Youtube, Wikipedia and others like these, all born of the Internet.  And us, the generation blessed to soar across it... this fact, to each of us is overwhelming and absolutely awesome. And I know that each of us does realize that the day we were born, we were chosen to be here, right now, standing together in this point in time for Mankind.  Including also, in the history of man against the machine we find ourselves at a storybook or feature film reality.

We are in a Global Revolution, all of us, alive during this surely pivotal and defining time of life on planet Earth. 

Knowing the time is finally come, I went down to City Hall alone, just like everyone else with the calling, embarrassed to admit it was the first time I’d ever hopped on the subway, I packed my camera, water and a few bucks and took part in Day One, the launch of Occupy Los Angeles and have been here everyday since.

It was difficult to join a committee, I was a little shy of course, but reminding myself always that self-consciousness is ego based and I committed to continue at the least, in just being there. I have seen and maybe felt what others do still, the sentiment that the people involved in the committees are exclusive and cliquish. But, always giving everyone the benefit of the doubt, I “tabled “ the thoughts every day.  And I still came, because I was born to fight the Good Fight, I am a poet and an Angeleno and I have no choice but to take part in whatever capacity I am given the opportunity to.  

I knew that teams are created for both long term and short-term interaction. I also knew that the various teams that will have formed together interdependently and cooperatively to meet the needs of the Movement by accomplishing certain purposes and goals that, as in every formation of a team, there will always be an initial shift in team members and a redefining of purposes and goals as new aspects of the Movement become realized by each. 

Furthermore, as each team member realizes new aspects individually, more ideas are hatched and discussed, implemented or negated. This process develops as naturally as, for example, a duckling born with down feathers that will soon sprout new permanent feathers, the ones that will enable him to lift from his nest and take that first glorious flight onward and upward.

The purpose for creating teams is to provide a framework that will increase the ability of all occupiers to participate in planning, problem solving and decision making to better serve The Movement.

Finally, I realized that, within the formula to launch the Revolution, there had to be a catalyst, the catalyst beyond the despair, and the catalyst had to be a person or persons wherein the delicacy of failure or success in the formations of a leaderless organization lies in the hands of. I thought,  should the catalysts of the movement be operating in a shadow with self-serving ideals, the movement is doomed from onset. I realized this characteristic may not exist given the social, economical and environmental causes of The Movement, those being, well, starvation for one, you get it.

Should it be that we all agree The Movement benefits in it’s attempt to be a working decentralized organization, then in that same commitment,  I hereby insist we must strive to become as morally and righteously conscientious as the people that inspired us in the first place, the living beings that formulated the launch of this movement for us, whoever they are in reality or in our own individual myths of who they may be.  No doubt they walk the high road in the interest of the greater good for all. No doubt they were born to fight The Good Fight of these times not as leaders, but instead as powerful “catalysts”,  just as we were born to take part, the proof of that is that we are here, alive today. Pretty simple. And, to what capacity will each of us toil, and in what roles, we will all soon discover if we haven’t yet.

So, comrades if I may, in an attempt to quell the grievances and complaints of the growing pains within this movement let’s try first, to understand the make-up of these wonderful people I’m referring to as “The Catalysts”.  Firstly, each of them has an apparent and genuine interest in others, as well as have a genuine desire to lend a helping hand to everyone they meet, without exclusivity. They have adhered to the consensus system that Occupy has embraced quite strictly, in order to help people help themselves by listening and understanding, rather than giving advice. Embracing their apparent emotional intelligence, we must all learn to trust in others and in the decentralized network. Let’s each one of us strive to be an inspiration to all in The Movement and release the constraints of ego, allowing each of us to succeed in developing a tolerance for ambiguity. In other words, we should trust in the the lifeforce of the movement, it surely exists, and to place trust in it's power that is really beyond us, is what we must do.

Let’s try to not interfere with, or try to control the behavior of the contributing members of the gathered and forming decentralized organization. If we continue to engage in judgmental observation and opinion we prolong our success, confuse our purposes and push further away our goals.

If instead we adopt a positive reaction to all things unclear, be hopeful toward all suggestion, seek our teachers that are of course born to the Movement and foster group analyzed ideas, also, remain patient with those slow to grasp theory; or those that can’t foresee certain cause and effect. I believe that it’s possible with these and more positivity overall that we certainly can win this war. If we continue to divide the given army, with negativity and scrutiny, we may fail. And failure, ooh…I think the consequences will be bad, very bad.

These are perilous yet exhilarating times! Those of us that are born Indigo (metaphorically and truly) are risking it all in the good fight. We have to. We must keep on keepin’ on. The current quality of life has backed us into this fighter's corner and it's up to us to ensure that our future generations live in a peaceful and sustainable world.  Finally.

And while those among us continue to bicker,  we actually have a real, lurking, calculating and slick ass opponent. The enemy is using one of the most powerful tactics they have aced, and that is targeting with bad press to ensure less support for us. They are capitalizing on our inability to reach consensus more quickly and worse,  fighting amongst ourselves.

big picture big picture big picture

Poet A. Razor who just recently moved to Oakland sent me an article about the lack of organization of Occupy Oakland and I answered him with, “Los Angeles is not far behind Oakland in the case of bad impressions. There are a percentage of younger occupiers that think OLA is burning man. It’s not good. Oakland needs to hang in there though. Individually, each #occupy has to experience the "life of it's own" indigenous to itself. The growing pains are expected in a self-governing "leaderless" congregate. Shit, Razor. Personally, I think we need a couple more poets (the real kind) to cut to the chaste and act as interpreters to the under-educated as well as to the "over" educated. In time, all willing, we will finally win the lives we deserve to live. If you're involved with #OO, tell them it's the same all over the nation, this long in coming movement, it has a life of it's own and things will come together.

Tell them to practice kindness toward one another, this is important so as not to discourage and cause mutiny. Tell them to remain positive above all else, and to trust. There’s a war going on, and there is a delicate acceptance of the troops that have signed on. There are the indigos, the veterans, the hippies, the students, the homeless, the scrutinizers, the agent provocateurs, and the egotists. In the end, I believe it will eventually transform from the bad news bears into 300 against the mighty Persian army.

Manifest destiny, always believe and chant slogans of Solidarity, Peace, Love and Sustainability. And especially remind all that, “United We Stand Divided We Fall”.  it’s an old slogan of Solidarity. We mustn't fail to reach agreements, we cannot afford the distractions of bitterness.

And remember, we were chosen to be here, each one of us is important right now, standing together in this point in time for Mankind."

20 Comments

emwoccupyla's picture

Manifest Destiny

This term is archaeic and an insult to native american peoples, it refers to imperialistic practices, and to the idea that the US can do no wrong in its expansion of influence and power because it is the will of god, and that all crimes against humanity are absolved when they are done in it's name.

Also I take exception with listing great heroic figures of the civil rights struggle and the great emancepator and adding a musical artist who promoted a thug life mentality and promoted criminal activities, I think you need to read a little bit about the struggle these great men faced with courage and conviction, through action and deeds. The fact that they were all murdered does link them but they are in no other way similar. Dont place pop musicians on a pedestal, Dylan would tell you that himself, the last poets just a band, the doors just a band, rage against the machine just a band...

 

Rancho Larry's picture

I liked your piece....

Yvonne de la Vega ----

I take no offence at the Manifest Destiny phrase (I kinda like it myself, the Manifest Destiny of OWS --- it has a ring to it, don’t you think?), or the fact that Jim Morrision is referenced in the same sentence as Dr. King.  Actually as an OLD White Guy who got to grow up hanging on the Sunset Strip in the mid 60s and see the Doors at the Whiskey and Buffalo Springfield at Gazzarri's, I know Jim Morrision and Steve Stills influenced me more than Dr. King did growing up.  Does that make me BAD?  I don’t think so.

OMG is that Hearsay?  If it is oh well, that is MY history, My experience and MY interpretations in MY life.  Thanks for the TOLERANCE while letting me share this stuff….

 As a OWS supporter I am finding it more difficult to write anything STYLISH yet FACTUAL about OWS without SOMEBODY taking offence at SOME affront I have written, (no mater how NOT indented) to mother nature or animal rights (like gee I enjoy a good medium rare rib-eye).  I inevitably offend some sense of THEIR personal values be it, right, left, gay, straight, black, brown, red, white, or freeking BLUE.  OFFENDEES always seem to believe that you should have been born with THEIR values (the RIGHT ONES) that it has taken them a lifetime (even if it is only 16 or 18 years) to cultivate.

People People People!!!  It is about Tolerance and working together.  The YOUR VIEW steps on MY VIEW, and hurts my feelings, so I MUST lash out to CORRECT YOU is well kinda In-Tolerant, don’t you think?

 OK I get it, you’ve got a different set of filters than I do.  You have perhaps completely different life experiences than I do.  Hell, you may just barely understand English and I may not understand YOUR native language at all.   We NEED to tolerate, consider and accept the RIGHT of everyone to their perspectives, choices of words to express themselves, unless those words encourage violence.  Violence has no place on our side in this movement.  And PLEASE retain the RIGHT to just discount the Nut-balls, Screamers, A-holes, Nazis, Missionaries and others that KNOW they have the answer (without consensus I might add) for YOU, ME and US. But every time you get into an argument, verbal or on the blog or whatever, it dilutes your energy, it skews your focus, and drives a little more wedge in between us. Yes, US the folks who are WORKING this Direct Democracy thing to the degree each of us  CAN to bring the CHANGE we ALL so desperately need.   Support, Tolerate and in an agape way, Love each other.  Oh well thanks for the Rant!
Once again, Yvonne I LIKED your Piece...Because United We Stand... Divided We Will Certainly Fall.

Discussion NOT Disrespect

Respond  Do Not React

Rancho Larry

Rancho, you are quite correct

Rancho, you are quite correct.  The political football mentality has been used for decades to keep the focus on Dems/Repubs and "wins",  many can not comprehend the forces working behind the distraction.  Even worse, many just do not care as long their "team" is in a good position.  And the most destructive emotion from this staged "game", is, if my side breaks the law, it is OK.  And if their side gets caught doing that, we can't pursue prosecution, as "my MVP" would go down for doing the same thing!  Not to mention that our public servants value party loyalty over any Oath of Office taken.

E pluribus unum Latin for "Out of many, one", is a phrase on the Seal of the United States, along with Annuit cœptis and Novus ordo seclorum, and adopted by an Act of Congress in 1782. The motto was suggested in 1776 to the committee responsible for the developing the seal by Pierre Eugene du Simitiere.

Never codified by law, E pluribus unum was considered a de facto motto of the United States until 1956. 

Which is why, I again reiterate that Occupy support other, perhaps smaller groups demonstrations with similar goals.  Like this October "Citizens Intervention":  http://citizensintervention.com/

As you can see, their small list of goals encompass only some of the issues already brought up by the Committee, but all of them have been mentioned: http://www.coffeepartyusa.com/mission-statement

As you say, United we stand, let us continue to unite with citizens out there who do care and are willing to do something.  

"Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or... strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance." ~

Robert Kennedy

 
emwoccupyla's picture

My point, words are powerful, understand context.

I am neither seeting or angry. I thought this forum was about the freedom of expressing our thoughts and ideas, my critique was not intended to be hurtful, forgive me if you took it that way. I was only pointing out that from a historical perspective words are powerful and one needs to understand the context of phrases like "Manifest Destiny" while using them to express the meaning behind Occupy when in my opinion this particular phrase was coined and used in a manner that is quite contradictory to the values expressed by the movement.

The term "Manifest Destiny" was used as propaganda by the 1% to sell at least two wars in American History, the anexation of Texas and Oregon, and the internment and genocide of indiginous people.

"So this idea that manifest destiny, America as the vanguard of history, this means that no matter what it does as the imperial force in the world, its actions are benign and justifiable or defensive or preventive or pre-emptive and everyone else, you're suggesting is a "terrorist." Not I'm suggesting. It's just those are the terms that are used." - Noam Chomsky

The Steven Stills song "for What It's Worth" was about a near riot on the Sunset Strip that was more or less over zoning regulations and noise restrictions, it was hardly revolutuionary, had nothing to do with the Vietnam War or Kent State in fact the name of the song was what Stills said to a record exec when they asked if he had any additional material, he said for what it's worth I have this other song, the name stuck...

"If you love music, you are my friend" - Willie Nelson

I love music but ty to keep it in perspective, if it inspires you great, but do not worship pop idols. Actions speak louder than words. Props to Billy Bragg, Kanye West, Lupe Fiasco and all the artists that have supported and contributed in various ways to uplift and further the Occupy movement. I still say, a song is just a song, a band is just a band. My opinion.

"Music is a vibration" - Confucius 

"Music Is A Vibration, and words are airwaves. Music and words in unison are harmony" - Willie Nelson

"A life in the way of the Tao means living in harmony with the world and those who inhabit it." - unknown

 

Mahayana's picture

Hi Yvonne,I understand where

Hi Yvonne,
I understand where you are coming from but keep in mind that the phrase "Manifest Destiny" has a meaning that is traced back to the 14th century and is an ideology with negative connotations, regardless of what it may mean to you personally. The idea of "Manifest Destiny" is what gave the early Americans justification for killing Indians and Mexicans. I would be cautious about using the phrase because it can give off the opposite effect of what you are intending.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest_Destiny

The word "manifest" itself is not negative. (Nor is destiny of course) This is not in the least bit a matter of political correctness. Although you may not be aware of the historical implications of the phrase, it is nonetheless very real for MANY people to this very day.

The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves - in their separate, and individual capacities. -Abe

emwoccupyla's picture

1 phrase "2 words" and one association I felt was not worthy.

Just one final note from me, and for the record my name is Eric.

Out of your nearly 3000 word essay I mearly took exception to one two word phrase you used and pointed out it's negative connotations, and that I felt that a recording artist should not be likened to a list of honorable civil rights leaders and the president that was brave enough to free a race from slavery.

I did admittedly get a little snarky by pointing out that you cannot quote yourself, sorry for that but it was after several exchanges where you got a little personal as well. You seem to be very invested in your beliefs and I commend you for that but you also need to listen, think and ask yourself if you own ego is getting in your way. Stop being so defensive, I agree with most of the 2997 other words you shared, remember just because you seem to be an official blogger you do not speak for the movement, OccupyLA or the 99%, the idea of unanimus concent is a collective conciousness, diversity and thoughtfullness.

Mahayana's picture

Manifest Destiny

Great idea, lets take words and phrases & make our own definitions for them! I kind of like the word "genocide". It has a nice ring to it. It'll be like a mash up of "generations" and "coincide". It'll represent how people of all ages and generations can coincide & find our similarities. Come on everybody, Let's bring about genocide today! Woohoo for genocide.

See how stupid that is? If you take issue with a phrase that has been recognized for hundreds of years, I suggest you send your complaints to Merriam Webster. You know, because that phrase IS in the dictionary. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/manifest%20destiny

"I am offended I was made to learn this history at all."

If this was the first time you ever heard of the phrase "Manifest Destiny" then shame on your 4th grade Social Studies teacher!!!

Do not be opposed to learn history no matter how horrific the realities of it are. Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it. I didn't intend to be bitchy about it, but my first post to you was not meant to offend you. I was just trying to make you aware of your misuse of the phrase. You seem sweet and peaceful in your original post but you certainly don't respond well to criticism.

But yes, I agree, lets move forward.

The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves - in their separate, and individual capacities. -Abe

prayn4peace's picture

Nice post

I just wanted to say I love your piece!  Whether I agree with everything in it or not, I love that you entered into the writing of it, as well as into the experience of the occupation movement, with a positive attitude, compassion, and patience for differences in opinion.  Far too many people blogging on this site are doing so with hostility and intolerance, and your piece is a refreshing change of pace.  I can feel your excitement and your hope for the future, and it's contagious!

Thank you for this, Yvonne.

emwoccupyla's picture

Peace Yvonne.

I hope you new piece is wonderful.

I have been at OLA since the beginning, have had to take care of a few things away from the occupation site (my occupation) from time to time but whenever possible I attend committee meetings and GA's, if I cannot in person I have done so via the Livestream. I have whenever possible through conversation and social media promoted the idea of Occupy and outreached to those not involved to inform them and encourage their involvement.

Juan, if I am not mistaken is the gentelman that spoke at last nights GA about being at the Obama demonstration and was later making some noise about getting something real done instead of all of the talk. I am 100% behind Juan, enough talk.

The discussion over the 100% or 90% model was necessary but it went on too long and should have found a different venue. It is funny that about 10 days ago there was a proposal to discuss the GA model and other general principles for a period of not less than a week that was hard blocked by a large number of people, but that proposal manifested itself as an ongoing discussion anyway and now we will have a week to test the 90% model. I personally believe that it was constructive and have hope for the 90% model. Ipersonally believe in an 80/20 model but that is again, my opinion.

Thank you again for your kind response, many times when I am trying to further a discussion it can be misconstrued as objectional but I only wish to further examine the issues, my philosophy is sometimes to play the devils advocate in order to get people to test their own ideas and convictions, it is a method of discourse and nothing more.

One final comment that is more a matter of the elements of style in your blog, please do not take it personally, take it as constructive criticizm. One cannot quote oneself. At the end of your blog you have made a play on the words of a Gil Scott Herron lyric, nothing wrong with that but I wanted to point it out from a purely editorial perspective. 

Pages